¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ

The programme will normally be designed by ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ staff in consultation with the partner organisation. ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ will ensure that the academic level of the programme is consistent with the level of any equivalent programme taught in Edinburgh. This means the overall content and approaches to learning, teaching and assessment are the same as for modules delivered at ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ. However, lecturers have flexibility to adapt learning experiences and assignments to reflect the local context and students’ professional needs. 

The programme is delivered by faculty appointed by the partner organisation. (¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ must confirm that all staff appointed are suitable.) ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ is responsible for quality assurance and academic guidance. ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ faculty contribute to the programme through support and advice and the provision of staff development. 

A member of ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ staff from the related programme in Edinburgh is the designated Collaborative Academic Lead. He or she is the first point of contact for all queries and liaises closely with the Programme Leader at the partner organisation. Individual members of ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ staff liaise with individual module co-ordinators regarding specific modules. 

The partner faculty conduct first marking of assessments. Assessments are checked and (where necessary) second marked by ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ staff. This is intended to ensure that the grades awarded are consistent with the grades that would be awarded to similar work in the UK. This model is in place for all ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ collaborations in the UK and overseas and is in line with the approach taken by other UK universities. ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ appoints an external examiner from another university to act as an independent check on the academic quality of the student work.

Marks are confirmed by a Board of Examiners which is chaired by a senior member of ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ staff. Final awards and official transcripts of results are issued by ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ.

All UK universities are required to demonstrate alignment with the Expectations set out in the Quality Assurance Agency’s (QAA) UK Quality Code.  Robust quality assurance procedures apply at ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ, which are consistent with QAA Expectations and sector wide good practice.

The key elements of ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ’s quality framework are:

• Collection and evaluation of student feedback
• Programme committees and student representation
• Provision of annual programme monitoring reports
• Moderation of assessment by ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ markers and by an external examiner
• Validation and periodic review (normally every five years)

In addition, a Joint Board of Studies between ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ and the partner organisation is held annually to oversee the operation of the collaboration.

Any new programme must go through an approval process known as ‘validation’, which consists of a panel of academic staff reading through detailed programme documentation and meeting with the staff who will be teaching the programme. After the meeting the panel makes a decision on whether any changes are needed to the design and management of the programme. This ensures that the partner is fully prepared to run the programme.

For further information on our quality framework, please refer to the Quality website.

Once the programme has been validated it cannot be changed without approval from ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ.

We expect overseas partners to provide student support services locally, such as:

• Personal tutorial support
• Careers advice
• Access to counselling or medical services
• Help with special educational needs or disabilities
• Extra-curricular activities (social clubs, sports, voluntary work)

Partners must provide library and IT facilities for students. There must be enough computers and sufficient network capacity to support several users accessing the system at the same time. All students who are registered on a ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ programme will be given a ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ email account which allows them to use ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ’s electronic resources. This includes an extensive collection of electronic journals. However, partners must provide textbooks and print copies of journals in their own libraries. Partners must also ensure there is a member of staff who can guide and advise students on how to use ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ’s electronic resources.

The partnership is run in accordance with a detailed contract which defines the respective responsibilities of each partner. This contract will also define the how the partners will make sure students can finish their programme, even if the partnership ends.

The contract will include an annual payment to ¶¶ÒõÊÓƵ in return for the academic advice, intellectual property and quality assurance we provide.